Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 12:57:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 12:56:51 -0400 Received: from theseus.mathematik.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.166.2]:5610 "HELO theseus.mathematik.uni-ulm.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 12:56:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20010424165632.3728.qmail@theseus.mathematik.uni-ulm.de> From: "Christian Ehrhardt" Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 18:56:32 +0200 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BUG: Global FPU corruption in 2.2 In-Reply-To: <20010423161148.6465.qmail@theseus.mathematik.uni-ulm.de> <9c48gv$fbk$1@penguin.transmeta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <9c48gv$fbk$1@penguin.transmeta.com>; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:10:07AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:10:07AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > ptrace only operates on processes that are stopped. So there are no > locking issues - we've synchronized on a much higher level than a > spinlock or semaphore. This is only true for requests other than PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_ATTACH is exactly what I'm worried about. regards Christian -- THAT'S ALL FOLKS! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/