Return-Path: Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Oct 1999 13:53:24 -0400 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ; Fri, 15 Oct 1999 13:53:08 -0400 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:22461 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Oct 1999 13:52:15 -0400 From: kanoj@google.engr.sgi.com (Kanoj Sarcar) Message-Id: <199910151750.KAA99441@google.engr.sgi.com> Subject: Re: locking question: do_mmap(), do_munmap() To: ralf@oss.sgi.com (Ralf Baechle) Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 10:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Cc: manfreds@colorfullife.com, sct@redhat.com, viro@math.psu.edu, andrea@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu In-Reply-To: <19991015115816.B948@uni-koblenz.de> from "Ralf Baechle" at Oct 15, 99 11:58:16 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Content-Length: 2331 Lines: 52 > > On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 09:32:54AM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > > Kanoj Sarcar wrote: > > > Here's a primitive patch showing the direction I am thinking of. I do not > > > have any problem with a spinning lock, but I coded this against 2.2.10, > > > where insert_vm_struct could go to sleep, hence I had to use sleeping > > > locks to protect the vma chain. > > > > I found a few places where I don't know how to change them. > > > > 1) arch/mips/mm/r4xx0.c: > > their flush_cache_range() function internally calls find_vma(). > > flush_cache_range() is called by proc/mem.c, and it seems that this > > function cannot get the mmap semaphore. > > Currently, every caller of flush_cache_range() either owns the kernel > > lock or the mmap_sem. > > OTHO, this function contains a race anyway [src_vma can go away if > > handle_mm_fault() sleeps, src_vma is used at the end of the function.] > > The sole reason for fiddling with the VMA is that we try to optimize > icache flushing for non-VM_EXEC vmas. This optimization is broken > as the MIPS hardware doesn't make a difference between read and execute > in page permissions, so the icache might be dirty even though the vma > has no exec permission. So I'll have to re-implement this whole things > anyway. The other problem is an efficience problem. A call like > flush_cache_range(some_mm_ptr, 0, TASK_SIZE) would take a minor eternity > and for MIPS64 a full eternity ... > > Ralf Ralf, Looking in 2.3.21, all the find_vma's in arch/mips/mm/r4xx0.c are used to set a flag called "text" which is not used at all. Also, if the find_vma returns null, the code basically does nothing. So the optimized icache flushing is probably not implemented yet? Then, the only reason to do the flush_vma currently is to check whether the lower level flush routine should be called. Without holding some locks, this is always tricky to do on a third party mm. Btw, this probably belongs to linux-mips, but what do you mean by saying the icache might be dirty? Its been a while since I worked on the older mips chips, but as far as I remember, the icache can not hold dirty lines. Kanoj - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/