Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:05:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:04:56 -0400 Received: from [213.97.199.90] ([213.97.199.90]:3456 "HELO roku.redroom.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:04:47 -0400 From: "David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=F3mez" ?= Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 21:03:13 +0200 (CEST) To: Tomas Telensky cc: "Mike A. Harris" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [PATCH] Single user linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Tomas Telensky wrote: > > But, what I should say to the network security, is that AFAIK in the most > of linux distributions the standard daemons (httpd, sendmail) are run as > root! Having multi-user system or not! Why? For only listening to a port > <1024? Is there any elegant solution? > httpd as root ? that's what i call a clueless network admin. sendmail has an OBSOLETE design. Use a good MTA like qmail. Exim or smail are ok, but they're still "sendmailish". David G?mez "The question of whether computers can think is just like the question of whether submarines can swim." -- Edsger W. Dijkstra - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/