From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com>
To: <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>,
       "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:47:22 -0800
Message-ID: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKCENOPKAA.davids@webmaster.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <1100041582.16689.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-To: davids@webmaster.com
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 745
Lines: 22


> On Maw, 2004-11-09 at 20:23, David Schwartz wrote:

> > 	Yes, they do. The whole point of the "additional
> > restrictions" clause is to
> > *prohibit* other contracts or obligations that act to restrict
> > your ability
> > to exercise the rights under the GPL.

> Correct. But you can exercise your rights under the GPL in this case.

	Subject to those additional restrictions. You can exercise your rights, but
then there is a penalty. (Which means it wasn't a right in the first place.)

	DS


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/