Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261757AbUKJMkv (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:40:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261761AbUKJMkv (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:40:51 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:18339 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261757AbUKJMko (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:40:44 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Subject: Re: Mangling attributions. Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:40:34 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200411060407.iA647Wx6013692@hera.kernel.org> <1100083318.21273.41.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> <20041110111333.A18233@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <4191F9FE.8060701@tebibyte.org> <20041110114935.B18233@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.80-203-227.nextgentel.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JR6qQoCKfXeWrsIQXZxKaITnaAM= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1757 Lines: 36 Russell King writes: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 12:22:38PM +0100, Chris Ross wrote: >> Russell King escreveu: >> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 10:41:58AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: >> >>Russell, please don't mangle the attribution in this way. Please include >> >>a correct email address for the submitter of the mail, and in any >> >>Signed-Off-By: lines. The idea is that we're supposed to be able to work >> >>out who submitted stuff, and how to get in touch with them if we want >> >>to. >> > >> > Tough. Shit. I'm not changing this. Sorry. >> > >> > If you don't agree with my stance on the Data Protection Act, go and find >> > someone else to merge patches. >> >> Ouch! In what way do you feel a proper "signed off by" contravenes the >> Data Protection Act, the gist of which is that personal information may >> be used only with permission and for the purpose for which it was given. >> I would have thought that signing off the patch meets both those >> criteria. Why do you think it doesn't? > > Please read what the act says and consider what a personal email address > is, and consider that placing personal data from someone on a website or > placing it in BK in the EU is publishing personal data outside the realms > of the EU. Well, let people agree to their email address being published if they wish. I personally don't mind it at all. Is this the reason a patch from me is attributed to mru@com[torvalds] on bkbits? -- M?ns Rullg?rd mru@inprovide.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/