Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261955AbUKJP5j (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:57:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261957AbUKJP5j (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:57:39 -0500 Received: from dfw-gate2.raytheon.com ([199.46.199.231]:44250 "EHLO dfw-gate2.raytheon.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261955AbUKJP5i (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:57:38 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.23 To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Amit Shah , Karsten Wiese , Bill Huey , Adam Heath , emann@mrv.com, Gunther Persoons , "K.R. Foley" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Schmidt , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano , Lee Revell , Rui Nuno Capela , Shane Shrybman , Thomas Gleixner , Michal Schmidt X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001 Message-ID: From: Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:57:01 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on RTSHOU-DS01/RTS/Raytheon/US(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 11/10/2004 09:57:03 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SPAM: 0.00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 782 Lines: 19 >> [...] I also noticed that /proc/sys/kernel/preempt_wakeup_timing was >> removed at .20 but not sure if that was deliberate. [...] > >yeah, this was deliberate - it's a side-effect of separating it from the >other timing options. OK. So maybe I didn't understand what you said previously. Now, if I build to get maximum-latency wakeup values, I can't get the IRQ off or preempt off timing and traces? If that's not true, how do I switch between the different sampling methods? --Mark H Johnson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/