Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261256AbUKJX1E (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:27:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262120AbUKJX1E (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:27:04 -0500 Received: from smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.170.80]:29776 "HELO smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261256AbUKJX07 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:26:59 -0500 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Kyle Moffett Subject: Re: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:26:39 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Bill Davidsen , =?iso-8859-1?q?=3D=3Futf-8=3Fq=3FRapha=EBl_Rigo_LKML=3F=3D?= , Michael Poole , davids@webmaster.com, Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <87actqfigw.fsf@sanosuke.troilus.org> <419283EF.8050708@tmr.com> <87686367-336D-11D9-857E-000393ACC76E@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <87686367-336D-11D9-857E-000393ACC76E@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411101826.43718.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1396 Lines: 31 On Wednesday 10 November 2004 06:09 pm, Kyle Moffett wrote: > On Nov 10, 2004, at 16:11, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > That web page seems pretty clear... some parts of the prerelease are > > non-GPL, you can distribute the GPL code as usual. Unless there is > > some claim that the non-GPL parts are derived from GPL original > > source or contain GPL code, why shouldn't they restrict the > > distribution > > of their own code? > > The make it difficult if not effectively impossible to separate the two, > claiming that therefore they are not under the restrictions of the GPL. > However, the GPL _clearly_ states that if it is distributed as a single > work, then all parts _must_ be distributable under the terms of the > GPL. I believe that a single binary firmware image is a single "work" > according to the definition provided in the GPL, and therefore by > distributing their code as a part of it, they have implicitly applied > the > GPL to said work (assuming it was not GPLed already for other > reasons). > No, no, no. Firmware image here is the same as a CD that you receive from a distribution and is mere an aggregation. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/