Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262048AbUKKBUo (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:20:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262074AbUKKBUo (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:20:44 -0500 Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.125]:20418 "HELO pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262048AbUKKBUi (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:20:38 -0500 Subject: Broken kunmap calls in rc4-mm1. From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: ncunningham@linuxmail.org To: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1100135825.7402.32.camel@desktop.cunninghams> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6-1mdk Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:17:05 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1037 Lines: 36 Hi Andrew et al. That oops in kunmap got me thinking of my recent DEBUG_HIGHMEM additions, so I want for a walk through the -mm4 patch, and found plenty of instances of people making the same mistake I did... using the struct page * in the call to kunmap, rather than the virtual address. I guess the best way to handle it is find/notify the respective authors of patches in the tree? The problems are in: Reiser4 (lots) CacheFS (lots) afs binfmt_elf libata_core (I'm hoping some of the above people will see this message and save me some effort :>) Regards, Nigel -- Nigel Cunningham Pastoral Worker Christian Reformed Church of Tuggeranong PO Box 1004, Tuggeranong, ACT 2901 You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. -- Romans 5:6 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/