Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:08:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:07:57 -0400 Received: from 64-42-29-14.atgi.net ([64.42.29.14]:11783 "HELO mail.clouddancer.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:07:48 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: compile error 2.4.4pre6: inconsistent operand constraints in an In-Reply-To: <9c3pgm$u0$1@ns1.clouddancer.com> In-Reply-To:

<9c3pgm$u0$1@ns1.clouddancer.com> Reply-To: klink@clouddancer.com Message-Id: <20010424230742.0C1906808@mail.clouddancer.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 16:07:42 -0700 (PDT) From: klink@clouddancer.com (Colonel) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In list.kernel, axel wrote: > >How about correcting the needed gcc version in Documentation/Changes? Linux, with up to date documention?? In your dreams perhaps. >On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > >> > after having had trouble with compilation due to old gcc version, i have >> > updated to gcc 3.0 and received the following error: >> >> 2.4.4pre6 only builds with gcc 2.96. If you apply the __builtin_expect fixes >> it builds and runs fine with 2.95. Not tried egcs. The gcc 3.0 asm constraints >> one I've yet to see a fix for. BTW. The above attitude was fostered by informing the Changes maintainer that the recommended NFS userspace server was on the exploits list (back in the 2.0 kernel days when knfs was new) and getting a "I don't use that, so what" response. ...and the documentation continued to recommend an exploitable NFS server... in short: you must cross-check to be sure, at least in linux you have a few more options. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/