Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:49:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:49:21 -0400 Received: from 64-42-29-14.atgi.net ([64.42.29.14]:4356 "HELO mail.clouddancer.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:49:08 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@conectiva.com.br Message-Id: <20010424234901.6FCD578478@mail.clouddancer.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 16:49:01 -0700 (PDT) From: klink@clouddancer.com (Colonel) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Colonel To: marcelo@conectiva.com.br CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: (message from Marcelo Tosatti on Mon, 23 Apr 2001 20:31:12 -0300 (BRT)) Subject: Re: 2.4.4-pre6 : THANKS! very snappy here [nt] Reply-to: klink@clouddancer.com In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 20:31:12 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-Sender: marcelo@freak.distro.conectiva Just as curiosity --- did it got faster in pre5 ? On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Colonel wrote: > but since you read it, system seems like it's running twice as fast Actually, it made not be pre6. I patched the kernel per some thread on LKML a few days before, but had not had the opportunity to reboot and run it until pre6. The patch was : --- linux/mm/page_alloc.c.~1~ Tue Mar 20 15:05:46 2001 +++ linux/mm/page_alloc.c Sat Apr 21 19:01:47 2001 @@ -454,7 +454,6 @@ if (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) { memory_pressure++; try_to_free_pages(gfp_mask); - wakeup_bdflush(0); goto try_again; } } It would make more sense that the above change was responsible for the improvement. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/