Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262411AbUKKXAq (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2004 18:00:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262413AbUKKW7A (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:59:00 -0500 Received: from pool-151-203-245-3.bos.east.verizon.net ([151.203.245.3]:13060 "EHLO ccure.user-mode-linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262410AbUKKW5F (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:57:05 -0500 Message-Id: <200411120109.iAC19jPV005324@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.1-RC1 To: Bodo Stroesser cc: akpm@osdl.org, Blaisorblade , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML - signal bug fix In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:09:50 +0100." <4193AAEE.1000800@fujitsu-siemens.com> References: <200411111957.iABJvHPV004137@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <4193AAEE.1000800@fujitsu-siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 20:09:35 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 724 Lines: 18 bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com said: > But IMHO the solution shouldn't be resetting to the old state, that > did syscall restarting wrong! The problem, you fix here, doesn't > occur, when using my complete patchset. And my patches fix UML's wrong > syscall restart handling. And other issues they fix, too. OK, I was trying to be minimal with those patches, and I guess I overdid it a bit. I'll get the rest of your changes in, and back this fix out in the process. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/