Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261297AbUKNNTH (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:19:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261298AbUKNNTH (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:19:07 -0500 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:28371 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261297AbUKNNTE (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:19:04 -0500 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:49:32 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Gunther Persoons Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.25-1 Message-ID: <20041114124932.GB11042@elte.hu> References: <20041103105840.GA3992@elte.hu> <20041106155720.GA14950@elte.hu> <20041108091619.GA9897@elte.hu> <20041108165718.GA7741@elte.hu> <20041109160544.GA28242@elte.hu> <20041111144414.GA8881@elte.hu> <20041111215122.GA5885@elte.hu> <41951380.2080801@spymac.com> <20041112201936.GA15133@elte.hu> <41961C03.10607@spymac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41961C03.10607@spymac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1008 Lines: 22 * Gunther Persoons wrote: > As i thought the init scripts were my problem. But i have an other > question. I recently started to use NFS. But with the mainline kernel > cpu usage is 100%, and when i look in top si shows bewteen 40 and 60% > cpu usage. With your kernel si is 0%, but ksoftriqd/0 shows around 38% > cpu usage and total cpu usage is around 52%. Is this normal? on my > server cpu usage is 2% but it uses a intel network card. My laptop is > using a wireless pcmcia card (cisco). normally the RT kernel has higher system overhead (all IRQ traffic goes to separate thread contexts, involving context-switching, etc.) so a _reduction_ in system overhead looks a bit strange. Is there a difference in performance? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/