Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:21:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:20:50 -0400 Received: from smtp1.cern.ch ([137.138.128.38]:11783 "EHLO smtp1.cern.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:20:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:20:30 +0200 From: Jamie Lokier To: Linus Torvalds Cc: David Howells , dhowells@redhat.com, "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [andrea@suse.de: Re: generic rwsem [Re: Alpha "process table hang"]] Message-ID: <20010425152029.C18214@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> In-Reply-To: <24526.987755027@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 10:46:01AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > For i386 and i486, there is no reason to try to maintain a complex fast > case. The machines are unquestionably going away - we should strive to not > burden them unnecessarily, but we should _not_ try to save two cycles. ... > Icache is also precious on the 386, which has no L2 in 99% of all cases. > Make it out-of-line. AFAIK, only some 386 clones have a cache -- the Intel ones do not. Therefore saving icache is not an issue, and the cycle cost of an out of line call is somewhat more than two cycles. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/