Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261761AbUKPKpa (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 05:45:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261694AbUKPKpa (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 05:45:30 -0500 Received: from mail.euroweb.hu ([193.226.220.4]:23704 "HELO mail.euroweb.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261954AbUKPKmv (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 05:42:51 -0500 To: penberg@gmail.com CC: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: <84144f020411160235616c529b@mail.gmail.com> (message from Pekka Enberg on Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:35:57 +0200) Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Request for inclusion] Filesystem in Userspace References: <84144f0204111602136a9bbded@mail.gmail.com> <84144f020411160235616c529b@mail.gmail.com> Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:42:44 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 730 Lines: 22 > > > > Yes. Would a device node be better? Perhaps. This way there's no > > need to allocate a major/minor for a device. > > ...or fix your Kconfig to select procfs. :) Yep, that's clearly the winning solution :) > Hmm? The conversion is guaranteed by the standard which makes them > redundant. And redundancy does hurt maintainability. The have been > patches to get rid of the existing casts so please don't introduce new > ones. OK, I don't really care either way. Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/