Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261970AbUKPM7w (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:59:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261967AbUKPM7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:59:51 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:34323 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261970AbUKPM6r (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:58:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:58:43 +0000 From: Russell King To: Linux Kernel List , Andrew Morton Subject: 2.6.10-rc2: parport_pc is broken Message-ID: <20041116125842.A20648@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel List , Andrew Morton Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 926 Lines: 22 I'm seeing this with CONFIG_PCI=n (which is fairly common for ARM machines): drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:3199: error: `parport_init_mode' undeclared (first use in this function) drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:3199: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:3199: error: for each function it appears in.) It seems to have broken with the VT8231 addition on 7 Nov 2004. Maybe we need to test kernel builds with CONFIG_PCI=n as part of a standard test set? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/