Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261985AbUKPOYr (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:24:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261983AbUKPOX5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:23:57 -0500 Received: from irulan.endorphin.org ([212.13.208.107]:42253 "EHLO irulan.endorphin.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261967AbUKPOIi (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:08:38 -0500 Subject: GPL version, "at your option"? From: Fruhwirth Clemens To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , Linus Torvalds Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZgbU1IA0NBQcWB+ozpVk" Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:08:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1100614115.16127.16.camel@ghanima> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2167 Lines: 54 --=-ZgbU1IA0NBQcWB+ozpVk Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Standard template for GPL licensing: "This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." As the text says, the licensee can choose the GPL version at his option, and he is likely to choose the one with better conditions. So, newer version can never limit the licensee's right, because he is always free to choose version 2. Therefore, successor versions can only remove limitations.=20 The institution to decide, how the new versions look like, is FSF. Being totally paranoid, assume the FSF decision makers are infected by a SCO designed virus to make them publish a new GPL version giving SCO the right to exploit GPL covered intellectual property. And there is a lot of the latter. Would be a classical "Duh!" situation. I'm about to submit a patch for a new cipher mode called LRW, adding new code/files to the crypto tree. My question is, especially to the maintainers: Are you going to accept code covered by the terms: * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation, version 2 of the License. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ --=20 Fruhwirth Clemens http://clemens.endorphin.org --=-ZgbU1IA0NBQcWB+ozpVk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBmgniW7sr9DEJLk4RAheJAKCJHV6E0pMmHRJfgQPfVG104jZ9xQCgjgT4 aFJtglRx7crdQKegeIL9in0= =ZLUj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZgbU1IA0NBQcWB+ozpVk-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/