Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:34:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:34:38 -0400 Received: from smarty.smart.net ([207.176.80.102]:42514 "EHLO smarty.smart.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:34:19 -0400 From: Rick Hohensee Message-Id: <200104251834.OAA04501@smarty.smart.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Single user linux To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:34:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org imel96@trustix.co.id wrote: > for those who didn't read that patch, i #define capable(), > suser(), and fsuser() to 1. the implication is all users > will have root capabilities. How is that not single user? I have been doing single-user oriented Linux/GNU/unix longer than anyone I'm aware of with exactly that focus. The one trivial patch I do to the kernel disgusts the core Linux developers for reasons unrelated to single user. cLIeNUX boots with 12 vt's logging in already as root. No kernel molestation. (But stay tuned ;o) Rather than me contributing further to the topic-skew, please have a browse at www.clienux.com Rick Hohensee cLIeNUX user 0 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/