Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262559AbUKRFQt (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:16:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262568AbUKRFQt (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:16:49 -0500 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:49569 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262559AbUKRFQs (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:16:48 -0500 To: Ian Pratt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Xen 2.0 VMM patches References: <31IYf-4Y-5@gated-at.bofh.it> From: Andi Kleen Date: 18 Nov 2004 05:50:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <31IYf-4Y-5@gated-at.bofh.it> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 652 Lines: 12 Ian Pratt writes: > arch-xen : large patch to add arch/xen and include/asm-xen This is 32bit only right? Do you plan a 64bit guest too? If yes, you would end up with two arch-xens in the end. Also are the differences to the native architecture really that big that a separate architecture makes sense? It's a lot of long term work to maintain a Linux architecture. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/