Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262628AbUKRGsR (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:48:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262639AbUKRGsR (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:48:17 -0500 Received: from siaag2ab.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.132]:13993 "EHLO siaag2ab.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262628AbUKRGsO (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:48:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:44:18 -0500 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Six archs are missing atomic_inc_return() To: linux-kernel Cc: Alan Cox Message-ID: <200411180148_MC3-1-8EE2-A85D@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 623 Lines: 22 Six archs do not have the atomic_inc_return() macro as of 2.6.10-rc2: cris h8300 m32r ppc ppc64 s390 net/core/neighbour.c:neigh_alloc() uses this macro. Does that mean these archs can't build network configs that use it? (Also, some archs do not seem to parenthesize the macro enough. Only sparc and parisc get it right.) --Chuck Ebbert 18-Nov-04 01:28:59 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/