Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 00:41:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 00:40:41 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:41231 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 00:40:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 00:00:35 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Linus Torvalds , lkml Subject: Re: [patch] swap-speedup-2.4.3-B3 (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Comments? > > More of a question. Neither Ingo's nor your patch makes any difference > on my UP box (128mb PIII/500) doing make -j30. Well, my patch incorporates Ingo's patch. It is now integrated into pre7, btw. > It is taking me 11 1/2 > minutes to do this test (that's horrible). Any idea why?~ Not really. If you have concurrent swapping activity, pre7 should improve the performance since all swap IO is asynchronous now. Only paths which really need to stop and wait for the swap data are doing it. (eg do_swap_page) > (I can get it to under 9 with MUCH extremely ugly tinkering. I've done > this enough to know that I _should_ be able to do 8 1/2 minutes ~easily) Which kind of changes you're doing to get better performance on this test? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/