Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 05:10:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 05:09:49 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:42761 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 05:09:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 04:29:52 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Linus Torvalds , lkml Subject: Re: [patch] swap-speedup-2.4.3-B3 (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > (I can get it to under 9 with MUCH extremely ugly tinkering. I've done > > > this enough to know that I _should_ be able to do 8 1/2 minutes ~easily) > > > > Which kind of changes you're doing to get better performance on this test? > > :) > > 2.4.4.pre7.virgin > real 11m33.589s > user 7m57.790s > sys 0m38.730s > > 2.4.4.pre7.sillyness > real 9m30.336s > user 7m55.270s > sys 0m38.510s Have you tried to tune SWAP_SHIFT and the priority used inside swap_out() to see if you can make pte deactivation less aggressive ? If you get the desired effect tuning those values and you end up with the conclusion that this tuning is a good change for most "common workloads", it can be integrated in the main kernel. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/