Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261217AbUKSBOa (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:14:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262864AbUKSBO3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:14:29 -0500 Received: from smtp201.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([216.136.129.91]:55664 "HELO smtp201.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263034AbUKSBOO (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:14:14 -0500 Message-ID: <419D48DE.6030703@yahoo.com.au> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:14:06 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040820 Debian/1.7.2-4 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: ak@suse.de, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: let x86_64 no longer define X86 References: <20041119005117.GM4943@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20041119005117.GM4943@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 633 Lines: 19 Adrian Bunk wrote: > And if you want to support both older and more recent kernels, the > following dependencies will be correct both before and after this > change: > - (X86 && !X86_64) > - (X86 && X86_64) > This last one surely can't be correct before *and* afterwards. But even in the current system, it is a pretty perverse thing to check for. I guess you meant: (X86 || X86_64) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/