Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 02:19:08 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: ak@suse.de, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, discuss@x86-64.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: let x86_64 no longer define X86
Message-ID: <20041119011908.GB6589@stusta.de>
References: <20041119005117.GM4943@stusta.de> <419D48DE.6030703@yahoo.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <419D48DE.6030703@yahoo.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1015
Lines: 33

On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 12:14:06PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> >And if you want to support both older and more recent kernels, the 
> >following dependencies will be correct both before and after this 
> >change:
> >- (X86 && !X86_64)
> >- (X86 && X86_64)
> >
> 
> This last one surely can't be correct before *and* afterwards. But even in
> the current system, it is a pretty perverse thing to check for. I guess you
> meant:
> 
> (X86 || X86_64)

Yes, thanks for the correcting my typo.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/