To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From: hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin)
Subject: Re: Kernel thoughts of a Linux user
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 05:04:24 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Mostly alphabetical, except Q, which We do not fancy
Message-ID: <cnjuso$ukp$1@terminus.zytor.com>
References: <200411181859.27722.gjwucherpfennig@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 05:04:24 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1085
Lines: 22

Followup to:  <200411181859.27722.gjwucherpfennig@gmx.net>
By author:    "Gerold J. Wucherpfennig" <gjwucherpfennig@gmx.net>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> - setting up kernel boot parameters with graphical tools is unreliable, 
> because the system doesn't know which bootloader entry was chosen.
> One solution to this issue is to create a new kernel parameter "loaderhint"
> where the bootloader will be able to set the number of the chosen boot entry.
> In the configuration file of the bootloader this will have to be explicitly 
> remarked e.g. ... loaderhint=%selection% ... . Unfortunately this could be
> circumvented, because it isn't mandatory and could be manipulated in the boot 
> loader configuration. (Other/better suggestions are welcome)
> 

Most boot loaders have an BOOT_IMAGE option visible in /proc/cmdline.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/