Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:43:50 +0300
From: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@sectorb.msk.ru>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>,
       Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.10-rc2
Message-ID: <20041119084350.GA14924@tentacle.sectorb.msk.ru>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411141835150.2222@ppc970.osdl.org> <20041118172606.GA6729@tentacle.sectorb.msk.ru> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411180956290.2222@ppc970.osdl.org> <20041118180100.GR26623@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041118180100.GR26623@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 973
Lines: 27

On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:01:00PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:59:00AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Nope. It got fixed differently: by only adding POSIX locks to the list. 
> > See locks_insert_block(). Since a non-posix lock cannot be blocked by a 
> > POSIX lock, the "if (IS_POSIX(blocker))" test should make sure we're 
> > always proper.
> > 
> > At least that's Willy claims. If you think he's wrong, holler.
> > 
> > Willy Cc'd, once more.
> 
> The problem certainly should have been fixed.  I'd like to know if it
> still occurs.
> 

It does not, thank you.

~
:wq
                                        With best regards, 
                                           Vladimir Savkin. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/