Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: RFC: let x86_64 no longer define X86
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
       discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20041119115539.GC21483@wotan.suse.de>
References: <20041119005117.GM4943@stusta.de>
	 <20041119085132.GB26231@wotan.suse.de> <419DC922.1020809@pobox.com>
	 <20041119103418.GB30441@wotan.suse.de>
	 <1100863700.21273.374.camel@baythorne.infradead.org>
	 <20041119115539.GC21483@wotan.suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1100865050.21273.376.camel@baythorne.infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:50:50 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 744
Lines: 25

On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 12:55 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 11:28:20AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Can you show some examples? We don't have this for any other
> > architecture.
> 
> Just grep for any use of X86 in Kconfig.

OK, I'll pick the first I find...

config ATP
        tristate "AT-LAN-TEC/RealTek pocket adapter support"
        depends on NET_POCKET && ISA && X86

Why is that OK on x86_64 but not Alpha? Why isn't the use of X86 a bug
in that case?

-- 
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/