Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:09:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:09:26 -0400 Received: from corp2.cbn.net.id ([202.158.3.25]:23304 "HELO corp2.cbn.net.id") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:09:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 19:11:24 +0700 (JAVT) From: To: John Cavan cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Single user linux In-Reply-To: <3AE741EA.561BE01F@damncats.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, John Cavan wrote: > Several distributions (Red Hat and Mandrake certainly) offer auto-login > tools. In conjunction with those tools, take the approach that Apple > used with OS X and setup "sudo" for administrative tasks on the machine. > This allows the end user to generally administer the machine without all > the need to hack the kernel, modify login, operate as root, etc. You can > even restrict their actions with it and log what they do. > > In the end though, I really don't see the big deal with having a root > user for general home use. Even traditionally stand-alone operating > you're right, we could do it in more than one way. like copying with mcopy without mounting a fat disk. the question is where to put it. why we do it is an important thing. taking place as a clueless user, i think i should be able to do anything. i'd be happy to accept proof that multi-user is a solution for clueless user, not because it's proven on servers. but because it is a solution by definition. imel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/