Message-ID: <419ECD57.7040306@namesys.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:51:35 -0800
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tridge@samba.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Reiserfs developers mail-list <Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: performance of filesystem xattrs with Samba4
References: <16797.41728.984065.479474@samba.org>	<419E1297.4080400@namesys.com> <16798.28061.485747.492855@samba.org>
In-Reply-To: <16798.28061.485747.492855@samba.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 913
Lines: 29

tridge@samba.org wrote:

>Hans,
>
> > Is this an fsync intensive benchmark?  If no, could you try with 
> > reiser4?  If yes, you might as well wait for us to optimize fsync first 
> > in reiser4.
>
>In the configuration I was running there are no fsync calls.
>
>I'll have a go with reiser4 soon and let you know how it goes. I'm
>also working on a new version of dbench that will better simulate the
>filesystem access patterns of Samba4.
>  
>
If you can describe what those are, it would do me a lot of good in 
regards to my understanding what it means about an fs to get a certain 
result on the benchmark, and what needs to be better optimized.

Cheers,

Hans


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/