Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:33:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:33:07 -0400 Received: from www.wen-online.de ([212.223.88.39]:5127 "EHLO wen-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:32:58 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 16:32:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Mike Galbraith X-X-Sender: To: Rik van Riel cc: Ingo Molnar , Marcelo Tosatti , Linus Torvalds , lkml Subject: Re: [patch] swap-speedup-2.4.3-B3 (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > > limit the runtime of refill_inactive_scan(). This is similar to Rik's > > > > reclaim-limit+aging-tuning patch to linux-mm yesterday. could you try > > > > Rik's patch with your patch except this jiffies hack, does it still > > > > achieve the same improvement? > > > > > > No. It livelocked on me with almost all active pages exausted. > > > > Misspoke.. I didn't try the two mixed. Rik's patch livelocked me. > > Interesting. The semantics of my patch are practically the same as > those of the stock kernel ... can you get the stock kernel to > livelock on you, too ? Generally no. Let kswapd continue to run? Yes, but not always. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/