Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263154AbUKTTLN (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:11:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263157AbUKTTLN (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:11:13 -0500 Received: from imap.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:21916 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263154AbUKTTLH (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:11:07 -0500 X-Authenticated: #4399952 Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 20:11:55 +0100 From: Florian Schmidt To: Lee Revell Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rui Nuno Capela , Mark_H_Johnson@Raytheon.com, "K.R. Foley" , Bill Huey , Adam Heath , Thomas Gleixner , Michal Schmidt , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano , Karsten Wiese , Gunther Persoons , emann@mrv.com, Shane Shrybman , Amit Shah Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.29-0 Message-ID: <20041120201155.6dc43c39@mango.fruits.de> In-Reply-To: <1100975745.6879.35.camel@krustophenia.net> References: <20041111215122.GA5885@elte.hu> <20041116125402.GA9258@elte.hu> <20041116130946.GA11053@elte.hu> <20041116134027.GA13360@elte.hu> <20041117124234.GA25956@elte.hu> <20041118123521.GA29091@elte.hu> <20041118164612.GA17040@elte.hu> <1100920963.1424.1.camel@krustophenia.net> <20041120125536.GC8091@elte.hu> <1100971141.6879.18.camel@krustophenia.net> <20041120191403.GA16262@elte.hu> <1100975745.6879.35.camel@krustophenia.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1211 Lines: 31 On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:35:44 -0500 Lee Revell wrote: > On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 20:14 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > i only tried the !PREEMPT version though - does that one work for you? > > Not sure, will test. My goal was to see if I could get the stability > and low latency of T3 (this is low enough latency for me!) with the new > versions. > > > Also, please send me the .config that produces the failing kernel. > > Sent (off-list). Hi, 29-4 with PREEMPT works very good (jackd at 64 frames: 0 xruns (running for 1h now), soundcard irq unthreaded). Opposed to 29-1 PREEMPT_REALTIME which showed some very weird jackd behaviour (xruns from 10usec to 50msec [!!!]). rtc_wakeup was showing no large jitter for that kernel though, nor did the different traces show anything that might have caused the jackd xruns. And yes, i configured the irq handlers sanely :) Will build 29-4 PREEMPT_REALTIME now and see how this one behaves. flo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/