Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263214AbUKUMZ2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Nov 2004 07:25:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261954AbUKUMZ2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Nov 2004 07:25:28 -0500 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:44507 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263214AbUKUMZP (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Nov 2004 07:25:15 -0500 Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:27:32 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Lee Revell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rui Nuno Capela , Mark_H_Johnson@Raytheon.com, "K.R. Foley" , Bill Huey , Adam Heath , Florian Schmidt , Thomas Gleixner , Michal Schmidt , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano , Karsten Wiese , Gunther Persoons , emann@mrv.com, Shane Shrybman , Amit Shah Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.29-0 Message-ID: <20041121132732.GA16170@elte.hu> References: <20041116134027.GA13360@elte.hu> <20041117124234.GA25956@elte.hu> <20041118123521.GA29091@elte.hu> <20041118164612.GA17040@elte.hu> <1100920963.1424.1.camel@krustophenia.net> <20041120125536.GC8091@elte.hu> <1100971141.6879.18.camel@krustophenia.net> <20041120191403.GA16262@elte.hu> <1100977765.6879.53.camel@krustophenia.net> <20041121124720.GB7972@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041121124720.GB7972@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 837 Lines: 23 * Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Lee Revell wrote: > > > > i only tried the !PREEMPT version though - does that one work for you? > > > Also, please send me the .config that produces the failing kernel. > > > > OK it allows me to set PREEMPT_NONE, PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS, and > > PREEMPT_HARDIRQS. This should be an illegal combination, right? > > in theory it should work just fine. hm, in practice it doesnt work - this is that causes the boot-time hang you saw during PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY. I'll make irq threading depend on PREEMPT, for the time being. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/