Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 05:13:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 05:13:46 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:39556 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 05:13:30 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 01:58:28 -0800 Message-Id: <200011070958.BAA03175@pizda.ninka.net> From: "David S. Miller" To: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl CC: jordy@napster.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru In-Reply-To: <200011070938.KAA03419@cave.bitwizard.nl> (R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl) Subject: Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP In-Reply-To: <200011070938.KAA03419@cave.bitwizard.nl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 10:38:12 +0100 (MET) From: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl (Rogier Wolff) David S. Miller wrote: > It is clear though, that something is messing with or corrupting the > packets. One thing you might try is turning off TCP header > compression for the PPP link, does this make a difference? Try specifying "asyncmap 0xffffffff" too. I wonder how this is specified under win98 :-) Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/