Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261975AbUKVIC7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:02:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261981AbUKVIC7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:02:59 -0500 Received: from hermine.aitel.hist.no ([158.38.50.15]:64267 "HELO hermine.aitel.hist.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261984AbUKVIAw (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:00:52 -0500 Message-ID: <41A19E44.9080005@hist.no> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:07:32 +0100 From: Helge Hafting User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomas Carnecky CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel thoughts of a Linux user References: <200411181859.27722.gjwucherpfennig@gmx.net> <419CFF73.3010407@dbservice.com> In-Reply-To: <419CFF73.3010407@dbservice.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2468 Lines: 54 Tomas Carnecky wrote: > Gerold J. Wucherpfennig wrote: > > - Replace DRI with sth. slimmer and intoduce real kernel drivers > >> and introduce real kernel drivers which handel all the initialization >> and interrupt handling (only minimal hardware abstraction). One goal >> is to >> remove X.org's PCI magic. Ultimately this shall give framebuffer and X >> the same basis. This was summarized on kerneltrap.org. > > > Is it possible to have two or more 'workstations' on one computer? Yes - thats what the "ruby" kernel patch is all about. I have a computer with two "workstations" at home. Compared to two computers, it saves space, power, parts, and above all - administrative work. Only one machine to upgrade, secure, configure. > A 'workstation' is a monitor, keyboard, mouse etc. tied together and > represents a place where someone can work. > I know it's possible to do this using a Xserver (running two Xservers on > different virtual consoles, each with its own > configuration/keyboard/mouse/monitor), but I'd like to realise it more > low-level, on the level of virtual terminals, so that each 'workstation' > would have it's own 'Ctrl+F1', 'Ctrl+F2' etc. Sure - ruby gives you that. X may need a patch in order to support ctrl+F2... on the scond keyboard, as the second console uses vt numbers from 17 to 32. > > Background: > Today, you can buy video cards with two connectors for monitors, or even > put two of those cards into one mainboard, making it possible to connect > four monitors to one computer. A P4 HT enabled CPU would be enough for > four office workers who edit text documents, unless they aren't playing > games :) So you could cut costs by buying one set of Mainboard/CPU/RAM > and then for every worker just a monitor/keyboard/mouse. > Places like internet-cafes could profit, they usually have many same > computers side by side, each with the same configuration, but on many no > one is working, they just run and consume energy. Yes, you can do that. The limit seems to be how many monitors you can connect - there seems to be no practical limit to how many USB keyboards & mice you can use. The lengt of wires might also be a problem with more than four. Helge Hafting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/