Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262076AbUKVM11 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 07:27:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262065AbUKVMZL (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 07:25:11 -0500 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:49034 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262085AbUKVMWi (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 07:22:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:24:59 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Rui Nuno Capela Cc: Florian Schmidt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Revell , mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com, "K.R. Foley" , Bill Huey , Adam Heath , Thomas Gleixner , Michal Schmidt , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano , Karsten Wiese , Gunther Persoons , emann@mrv.com, Shane Shrybman , Amit Shah , Esben Nielsen Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.30-2 Message-ID: <20041122132459.GB19577@elte.hu> References: <20041116125402.GA9258@elte.hu> <20041116130946.GA11053@elte.hu> <20041116134027.GA13360@elte.hu> <20041117124234.GA25956@elte.hu> <20041118123521.GA29091@elte.hu> <20041118164612.GA17040@elte.hu> <20041122005411.GA19363@elte.hu> <20041122020741.5d69f8bf@mango.fruits.de> <20041122094602.GA6817@elte.hu> <56781.195.245.190.93.1101119801.squirrel@195.245.190.93> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56781.195.245.190.93.1101119801.squirrel@195.245.190.93> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1764 Lines: 42 * Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > > great. I now suspect that some of the xrun problems Rui was observing on > > -RT kernel could be (positively) affected by these fixes too. > > > > Just made some test-runs with RT-V0.7.30-2, with my jackd-R + > 8*fluidsynth benchmark on my laptop (P4/UP), and the results don't > seem to be eligible to the hall of fame, at least when compared with > RT-0.7.7 as the ones I last posted here a few weeks ago. > > I hate to say this, but the XRUN rate has increased since RT-0.7.7, > and the maximum scheduling delay reported by jackd has also degraded > to 1000 usecs (was around 600 usecs). well, life would be too easy if two bugs were fixed at once ;) These were nodebug runs, right? Could you give me a description of the precise commands of how you started jackd and fluidsyth (and their versions) - so that i could try to reproduce & debug your setup. It is certainly a complex scheduling scenario. (perhaps with a link to the .sf2 and .mid files you used, if they are public - or whether it's fine if i use the VintageDreamsWaves-v2.sf2 sound-fonts that comes with fluidsynth plus a random .mid file from the net?) > OTOH, there's another thing: I don't seem to be able to build an > initrd image under the latest RT kernels. Something related to the > loopback device. When trying to run mkinitrd it stalls, somewhere > under this process: > > mount -t ext2 /root/tmp/initrd.img /root/tmp/initrd.mnt -o loop Do you know when this started, roughly? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/