Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261400AbUKVOrD (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:47:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261451AbUKVOob (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:44:31 -0500 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:35461 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261400AbUKVOmo (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:42:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:45:16 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Rui Nuno Capela Cc: Florian Schmidt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Revell , mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com, "K.R. Foley" , Bill Huey , Adam Heath , Thomas Gleixner , Michal Schmidt , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano , Karsten Wiese , Gunther Persoons , emann@mrv.com, Shane Shrybman , Amit Shah , Esben Nielsen Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.30-2 Message-ID: <20041122154516.GC2036@elte.hu> References: <20041117124234.GA25956@elte.hu> <20041118123521.GA29091@elte.hu> <20041118164612.GA17040@elte.hu> <20041122005411.GA19363@elte.hu> <20041122020741.5d69f8bf@mango.fruits.de> <20041122094602.GA6817@elte.hu> <56781.195.245.190.93.1101119801.squirrel@195.245.190.93> <20041122132459.GB19577@elte.hu> <20041122142744.0a29aceb@mango.fruits.de> <65529.195.245.190.94.1101133129.squirrel@195.245.190.94> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <65529.195.245.190.94.1101133129.squirrel@195.245.190.94> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 855 Lines: 24 * Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > > It seems jackd has a limitation to 14 clients atm (don't ask me why). The > > 15th kills jackd ;) > > > > So true. is there any fix for that? Loading 14 jack_test clients only uses up ~33% of CPU time on my testbox. Or should it be possible for me to trigger xruns using so many clients and 33% CPU utilization already? Could you perhaps try 14 instances of jack_test on your box, and see whether you can generate similar xruns as you could generate with fluidsynth? jack_test should certainly exclude as much jack-client side complexity as possible. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/