Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261388AbUKVOk6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:40:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261538AbUKVOix (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:38:53 -0500 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:64450 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262127AbUKVOWr (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:22:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:24:52 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: john cooper Cc: "Bill Huey (hui)" , Esben Nielsen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Priority Inheritance Test (Real-Time Preemption) Message-ID: <20041122152452.GA2036@elte.hu> References: <20041122092302.GA7210@nietzsche.lynx.com> <41A1F4B2.10401@timesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41A1F4B2.10401@timesys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 609 Lines: 17 * john cooper wrote: > I'd hazard a guess the reason existing implementations do not do this > type of dependency-chain closure is the complexity of a general > approach. [...] please take a look at the latest patch, it is i believe handling all the cases correctly. It certainly appears to solve the cases uncovered by pi_test. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/