Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262220AbUKVR0B (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:26:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262263AbUKVRZU (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:25:20 -0500 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:1411 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262260AbUKVRUD (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:20:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:19:32 -0600 From: Robin Holt To: Ray Bryant Cc: Kernel Mailing List , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , lse-tech , holt@sgi.com, Dean Roe , Brian Sumner , John Hawkes Subject: Re: scalability of signal delivery for Posix Threads Message-ID: <20041122171932.GA19440@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com> References: <41A20AF3.9030408@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41A20AF3.9030408@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 696 Lines: 14 On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 09:51:15AM -0600, Ray Bryant wrote: > We've encountered a scalability problem with signal delivery. Our > application > is attempting to use ITIMER_PROF to deliver one signal per clock tick to > each > thread of a ptrheaded (NPTL). These threads are created with CLONE_SIGHAND, > so that there is a single sighand->siglock for the entire application. Ray, can you provide a simple example application that trips this case? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/