Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262494AbUKVT16 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:27:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262493AbUKVTYR (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:24:17 -0500 Received: from out002pub.verizon.net ([206.46.170.141]:25801 "EHLO out002.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262364AbUKVTV2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:21:28 -0500 From: Gene Heskett Reply-To: gene.heskett@verizon.net Organization: Organization: None, detectable by casual observers To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Stupid question Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:21:27 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200411212045.51606.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <200411220721.26712.gene.heskett@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411221421.27351.gene.heskett@verizon.net> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out002.verizon.net from [151.205.10.220] at Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:21:27 -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1819 Lines: 46 On Monday 22 November 2004 14:02, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>>>Silly Q of the day probably, but what do I set in a Makefile for >>>> the -march=option for building on a 233 mhz Pentium 2? >>> >>>Now that's really stupid, but here's the answer: >>> >>>You run `make menuconfig` (or whichever you like) and choose >>> Processor Type "Pentium II". >> >>If I was building a kernel, then yes my question was stupid. >> >>Except I'm not building a kernel, I'm tryng to compile a module to >>drive some truely dumb hardware, reusing code that was last touched >>[...] > >Well, take a fresh kernel tree, set the desired CPU type, and then > look at the .config which is generated. Voil? -- in theory ;-) > I'm glad you put that caveat in there, Jan. :) >>Yeah, I'm stupid. Virtually all of my original C coding has been >> done on much smaller architectures, and 15 to 20 years ago. >> Terminal rust > >Never hurts trying to compile a 2.6 for 386SX if the will is strong. > :-) On an SX? No way Jose. That would take more will power than I have & I quit a 2 pack a day habit cold turkey 15+ years ago. Theres one of those things out in a storage shed, won't even run winderz > 95SR1, its been tried a couple of times. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.29% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/