Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263407AbUKVTd1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:33:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263399AbUKVTd0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:33:26 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:65443 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263339AbUKVTc5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:32:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:32:52 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Gene Heskett cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Stupid question In-Reply-To: <200411221421.27351.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Message-ID: References: <200411212045.51606.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <200411220721.26712.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <200411221421.27351.gene.heskett@verizon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 802 Lines: 24 >>Well, take a fresh kernel tree, set the desired CPU type, and then >> look at the .config which is generated. Voil? -- in theory ;-) >I'm glad you put that caveat in there, Jan. :) What? There are no bugs! They're features. >>Never hurts trying to compile a 2.6 for 386SX if the will is strong. >> :-) > >On an SX? No way Jose. That would take more will power than I have & Read more closely. I said "compile for" not "compile on". Jan Engelhardt -- Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung Am Fassberg, 37077 Göttingen, www.gwdg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/