Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:13:04 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC/v1][0/12] Initial submission of InfiniBand patches for review
Message-ID: <20041122221304.GA15634@kroah.com>
References: <20041122713.Nh0zRPbm8qA0VBxj@topspin.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041122713.Nh0zRPbm8qA0VBxj@topspin.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 797
Lines: 19

On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 07:13:24AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> organization of the code will be very much appreciated.  For example,
> the current set of patches puts include files in driver/infiniband/include;
> would it be preferred to put include files in include/linux/infiniband/,
> directly in include/linux, or perhaps in include/infiniband?

Who would be including these files, only drivers in drivers/infiniband?
Or from files in other parts of the kernel?

If from other parts of the kernel, use include/linux/infiniband.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/