Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262461AbUKVXpN (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:45:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262422AbUKVXor (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:44:47 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:62660 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262461AbUKVXj3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:39:29 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:43:25 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Anton Altaparmakov Cc: hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] problem of cont_prepare_write() Message-Id: <20041122154325.4d8e53ef.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <877joexjk5.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <20041122024654.37eb5f3d.akpm@osdl.org> <1101121403.18623.10.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20041122135354.38feab51.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 654 Lines: 14 Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > I always have a flush_dcache_page(page) between the memset() and > the SetPageUptodate() so I don't need the barrier, right? Or does the > flush_dcache_page() not imply ordering? err, flush_dcache_page() might indeed provide a write barrier on all architectures which need write barriers. Then again it might not ;) It's not intended that this be the case. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/