From: Alan Chandler <alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ide-cd problem
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:48:42 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
References: <200411201842.15091.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> <20041122130202.GO10463@suse.de> <200411221919.32174.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200411221919.32174.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200411222348.42149.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1023
Lines: 30

On Monday 22 November 2004 19:19, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Monday 22 November 2004 13:02, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > I think the more correct patch is the following. It seems I was wrong in
> > assuming that the ide_intr() path already waited 400ns for us, I think
> > this should work for you. Can you test it?
>
> Bad news - it didn't work.
>
> It certainly looks as though it should - I am trying to find out what not.
>

I meant of course "I am trying to find out why not".

If I make the delay 600ns it works - I guess my hardware is a little off spec.

If I leave the original udelay(1) in there, I get irq timeouts all over the 
place.


-- 
Alan Chandler
alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you,
 then they fight you, then you win. --Gandhi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/