Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261250AbUKWN4w (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:56:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261251AbUKWN4O (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:56:14 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:59629 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261250AbUKWN4K (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:56:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:55:33 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Guillaume Thouvenin cc: lkml Subject: Re: fork: add a hook in do_fork() In-Reply-To: <1101189797.6210.53.camel@frecb000711.frec.bull.fr> Message-ID: References: <1101189797.6210.53.camel@frecb000711.frec.bull.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 932 Lines: 27 > I don't know if this solution is good but it's easy to implement and >it just does the trick. I made some tests and it doesn't impact the >performance of the Linux kernel. Needs 2 additional CPU ops ;-) > I'd like to have your comment about this patch. Is it useful and is >it needed by someone else than me? Usually no, and I doubt there's a chance to get it in. It's not something 60% of all kernel users, linux distros and so forth will be going to use it. I guess I would have the same bad luck if I was to integrate the rpldev hooks from ttyrpld.sf.net. Jan Engelhardt -- Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung Am Fassberg, 37077 Göttingen, www.gwdg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/