Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261373AbUKWVlA (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:41:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261340AbUKWVia (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:38:30 -0500 Received: from mail.linicks.net ([217.204.244.146]:42001 "EHLO linux233.linicks.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261350AbUKWVgi (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:36:38 -0500 From: Nick Warne To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.4.28 -> ch..ch...changes.... Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:36:36 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411232136.36313.nick@linicks.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 683 Lines: 22 Hi Guys, I updated three boxes today to 2.4.28 (from .27), one at work, and two here at home (Redhat 7.1+, Slackware 10) I am intrigued terribly by the small footprint of memory usage now. I have gone through the changes file, but can really see nothing (to me, a n00b) that would alter that? Can anyone enlighten me? As always, great work too :) Nick -- "When you're chewing on life's gristle, Don't grumble, Give a whistle..." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/