Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 06:09:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 06:09:40 -0500 Received: from [62.172.234.2] ([62.172.234.2]:58027 "EHLO saturn.homenet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 06:09:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 11:09:33 +0000 (GMT) From: Tigran Aivazian To: Erik Mouw cc: Michael Vines , Catalin BOIE , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel hook for open In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > To test Y2k readiness of programs one simply can use my timetravel kernel > module. No, doing things in userspace is far more complex and less > reliable and also simply not good enough (because doesn't cover the case ~~~~~~~~ yes, yes, I am aware of the infamous "race in rmmod in blocked syscalls replaced by a module" problem. But now that y2k is long gone why should I fix it? :) (it is trivial to fix with MOD_INC/DEC_USE_COUNT anyway). > of statically-linked binaries): > > http://www.ocston.org/~tigran/tt/tt.html > > Regards, > Tigran > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/