Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261628AbUKWXPM (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:15:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261623AbUKWXMr (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:12:47 -0500 Received: from rrcs-24-227-247-8.sw.biz.rr.com ([24.227.247.8]:28369 "EHLO emachine.austin.ammasso.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261617AbUKWXLf (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:11:35 -0500 Message-ID: <41A3C31E.5060007@ammasso.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:09:18 -0600 From: Timur Tabi Organization: Ammasso User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesper Juhl CC: linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove pointless <0 comparison for unsigned variable in fs/fcntl.c References: <20041122010253.GE25636@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <41A30612.2040700@dif.dk> <41A38BF1.9060207@ammasso.com> <41A3C1AE.5060604@ammasso.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 569 Lines: 17 Jesper Juhl wrote: > My understanding of it is that it was just an example of how code that > generated warnings about limited range of datatype could actually be > perfectly fine. But if the example doesn't make any sense, then how does it prove the point? -- Timur Tabi Staff Software Engineer timur.tabi@ammasso.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/