Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262556AbUKXJQk (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 04:16:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262560AbUKXJQj (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 04:16:39 -0500 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:4326 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262556AbUKXJQ1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 04:16:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:18:54 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Esben Nielsen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Priority Inheritance Test (Real-Time Preemption) Message-ID: <20041124101854.GA686@elte.hu> References: <20041123133456.GA10453@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 605 Lines: 17 * Esben Nielsen wrote: > Results (in short): > -30-9 doesn't resolved nested locking well. The expected max locking time > in my test would be depth * 1ms - it is much higher just at a locking > depth at two. could you check the -30-10 kernel i just uploaded? I fixed the PI bugs you reported (and found/fixed other ones as well). Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/