Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262620AbUKXLeA (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 06:34:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262621AbUKXLeA (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 06:34:00 -0500 Received: from tri-e2k.ethz.ch ([129.132.112.23]:57614 "EHLO tri-e2k.ethz.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262620AbUKXLd5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 06:33:57 -0500 Message-ID: <41A470F9.4000407@dbservice.com> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:31:05 +0100 From: Tomas Carnecky User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Helge Hafting CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Kernel thoughts of a Linux user References: <200411181859.27722.gjwucherpfennig@gmx.net> <419CFF73.3010407@dbservice.com> <41A19E44.9080005@hist.no> <41A1CAD4.20101@dbservice.com> <41A46085.5050602@hist.no> In-Reply-To: <41A46085.5050602@hist.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Nov 2004 11:31:06.0129 (UTC) FILETIME=[162D2810:01C4D219] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1712 Lines: 40 Helge Hafting wrote: >> From the [ruby patch] documentation: >> The main problem up to this date (November 2004) is that linux kernel >> has only one behaviour regarding multiple keyboards : any key pressed >> catched on any keyboard is redirected to the one and only active >> Virtual Terminal (VT). >> >> Will this be changed/improved when the console code is moved into >> userspace, like some have proposed? > > > I don't know about any userspace console, but the ruby patch lets > you have several independent active VTs at the same time. So > the above mentioned problem is solved - they keyboards does > not interfere with each other. > I think the it would be much nicer to habe the console code in userspace, ruby is only a patch, not in the mainline kernel, and AFAIK not even in any experimental (-mm/-ac/-etc) tree. There are many aproaches how to solve the problem of having more than one ative VT, and the userspace console seems to be the nicest one. I know that Jon Smirl wrote an email some time ago, here it is: http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/8/2/111, look at point 15. I like the idea and I've written him several times, but he didn't answer :( Anyone knows what's happened with him? I know he's involved in the DRM development, so I CC to the dri-devel list. I'd really like to help with this, as I like and share his ideas. Is anyone already working on this? I mean pulling the console code out of the kernel into the userspace. tom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/