Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262742AbUKXOvY (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:51:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262679AbUKXOo6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:44:58 -0500 Received: from fep01fe.ttnet.net.tr ([212.156.4.130]:19426 "EHLO fep01.ttnet.net.tr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262742AbUKXOnM (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:43:12 -0500 Message-ID: <41A49DA5.9090900@ttnet.net.tr> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:41:41 +0200 From: "O.Sezer" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.3) Gecko/20041003 X-Accept-Language: tr, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcelo Tosatti CC: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: status of cdrom patches for 2.4 ? References: <41A3C391.8070609@ttnet.net.tr> <20041124074336.GB8718@logos.cnet> <20041124125319.GB13847@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20041124125319.GB13847@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1680 Lines: 47 Jens Axboe wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24 2004, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > >>On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 01:11:13AM +0200, O.Sezer wrote: >> >>>Hi all: >>> >>>What are the status of the cdrom patches for 2.4 series? >>>Namely the dvd patches which are dropped while in the >>>27-rc era, and the cd-mrw patch which never had a chance >>>trying to go in to 2.4. Jens? Mancelo? >> >>There were problems with the DVD-RW patches so I reverted them. Yup. Pat then posted a patch which supposedly fixed it by placing something like else if (CDROM_CAN(CDC_DVD_RAM)) ret = 0; in cdrom_open_write(): http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=109156838400001&r=1&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=109156820507518&w=2 Jens' MRW patch also introduces a new function: cdrom_dvdram_open_write (which, in turn, calls cdrom_media_erasable), CDROM_CAN(CDC_DVD_RAM) check in cdrom_open_write() is assigned to it; which again is supposed to fix it. >>Jens, what do you think? > > > I don't think it's worth the bother, the support is in 2.6. And I don't > want to maintain new atapi stuff for 2.4. Pat used to care about the > patches, but as he is no longer with Iomega I don't think there's anyone > to look after it. Which is truly a pity. Yes I can understand that a maintainer needs to concentrate on new trees etc, but it's pity. Especially hearing the pre-recorded "Hey 2.6 already has it, upgrade to it" message is always nice ;) Ozkan Sezer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/