Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 06:20:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 06:20:12 -0500 Received: from ha1.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au ([203.164.2.50]:55994 "EHLO mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 06:20:05 -0500 Message-ID: <3A07E600.FC1E089B@optushome.com.au> Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 22:22:40 +1100 From: Joel Beach X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Slow screen redraw in 2.4.x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've noticed noticeably slower screen refresh in 2.4.x than under the 2.2 kernel series. It's most noticeable when running xscreensaver with fast scrolling patterns, or when doing opague moves of large windows. I'm using Xfree 4.01 and the XFree driver for the Nvidia card (not the Nvidia binary package). This has been happening to me since the earliest 2.3.99 kernels, but it isn't really a very scientific observation, so I thought I'd wait and see if performance improved. It hasn't, so I thought I'd post it here to hear other people's thoughts on it. Would it have anything to do with shm performance under 2.4. I read that Rik said that it wasn't really as good as it could be. Does that mean that it should be slower than under 2.2 though? Sorry for my cluelessness. Tell me to get lost if this doesn't belong here, or let me know what tests I should run which would give a number to these observations. Thanks Joel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/